A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between potential neighbours around the construction of the wall in a coastal site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted nationwide attention following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of arranging breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier as well as Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved right into a extremely publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development will work at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek out to develop their spouse and children residence. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which progress pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their preparing permission by developing a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such areas are issue to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, particularly in a delicate coastal surroundings for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their arranging permission, and say the wall, which can be partially built, is in the proper position. Their authorized staff has characterised the action as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, where sights of the sea are both of those extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In line with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations, a picture which includes due to the fact turn out to be emblematic with the intensity on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they have been meant to Obtain Visible proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Times claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these kinds of steps were being cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a location impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been coated intimately with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as readers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt design pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second while in the authorized timeline.
In the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement around boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as created, goes further than what was approved and intrudes into secured land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging files, maps, and ailments attached to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is enthusiastic by issue for environmental security and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject Paul Feely and Rene Collier statements that the case is about preserving A non-public look at, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply just attempting to build a relatives household in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all functions are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed which the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.